Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Article: Two Lightweight Underdogs go Head to Head

  1. Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    4,063
    Chats
    2673

    Jump to Comments

    Two Lightweight Underdogs go Head to Head

    23 Comments by Gareth Rees Published on 02-20-2013 01:24 PM
    With Adrien Broner (26-0) having defended his WBC Lightweight title by running through the over matched Welshman Gavin Rees (37-2-1) on Saturday night. Attentions in the Lightweight division will now start to turn to the March 16th unification fight between Ricky Burns (35-2) and Miguel Vazquez (33-3) the consensus number 2 and 3 ranked fighters in the division. The fight will be the first unification fight on British shores since the 2008 Cruiserweight fight between David Haye (26-2) and Enzo Maccarinelli (35-6).

    Burns and Vasquez are two of the most underrated fighters in the world and don’t seem to be getting nearly as much respect from the US audience as they deserve. Burns is a two-weight world champion and the sweetheart of Scottish boxing at the moment and we have been craving for a Burns-Broner match up since Burns was WBO Super Featherweight champion. Unfortunately for a variety reasons the fight hasn’t come to fruition yet but if Burns defeats Vasquez, the calls for the Broner fight will be getting even louder.

    However Miguel Vasquez is not a man you can look past and can make anyone look bad due to his awkward style. Vasquez is ranked higher than Burns by the majority of websites, but with the fight being in Britain Burns should come in as a slight favourite. There were rumours that Vasquez wanted to fight Broner instead of Broner facing Rees, but for some reason the fight couldn’t be made. Vasquez is a back foot, who uses his movement to his advantage and rarely gets dragged into a brawl, which could in theory make him a tougher opponent for Broner than Burns.

    This fight will undoubtedly be Burns’ toughest test to date and although the bookmakers will make him the slight favourite, there will be many people as always betting against Burns, who seems to be the constant underdog yet still doesn’t get the credit he deserves. The fight matches two of the taller fighters in the division, so Burns’ jab and the way he cuts the ring off will be the key to victory for him in what I expect to be a tactical fight and should end up going to the judges scorecards. The winner will not only be named WBO and IBF Lightweight champion, but could be seen as the number one fighter in the division and in for a big pay day in an attempt to halt the apparent future pound for pound star of world boxing (well we hope so).

    Other fights on this stacked Rule Britannia card include Nathan Cleverly (25-0) defending his WBO Light Heavyweight title against his mandatory challenger Robin Krasniqi (39-2), George Groves (16-0) looking to add the European Super Middleweight title to his collection in the first fight of what he hopes to be a big 2013. Also there will be the return of Dereck Chisora (15-4) who is expected to have his British boxing license back and it will be the first time he has fought since getting knocked out last July in the grudge match against David Haye and he will be trying to stop his 3 fight losing streak.


  2. Total Comments 23

    Comments

  3. #2
    Mops the Gym Floors
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    45
    Chats
    120
    I think Vazquez wins. Burns may have a chance but imo he's just not good enough to be a favorite.

  4. #3
    Moderators Whyavier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    LA, muthafucka
    Posts
    14,238
    Chats
    3406
    Let me know when it's actually confirmed so I can start discussing it.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  5. #4
    Title Holder
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    4,063
    Chats
    2673
    Quote Originally Posted by Whyavier View Post
    Let me know when it's actually confirmed so I can start discussing it.
    It's now signed so start discussing

  6. #5
    Established Pro StenDA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    793
    Chats
    1
    Burns ain't underrated. He sucks.

  7. #6
    Mops the Gym Floors
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    45
    Chats
    120
    Quote Originally Posted by StenDA View Post
    Burns ain't underrated. He sucks.
    I got the same impression.
    Last edited by Conan; 02-20-2013 at 07:39 PM.

  8. #7
    Title Holder
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    4,063
    Chats
    2673
    Quote Originally Posted by StenDA View Post
    Burns ain't underrated. He sucks.
    Thank you for proving my point, people think he sucks but he always surprises us

  9. #8
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    14,932
    Chats
    1282
    was peewee over matched due to size ? certainly AB wasnt the biggest guy peewee fought




  10. #9
    Mops the Gym Floors
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    45
    Chats
    120
    Gotta get rid of the subscription for this thread. Wasn't aware of it but emails keep coming in...its a nuisance.

  11. #10
    Title Holder
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    4,063
    Chats
    2673
    Quote Originally Posted by theproudlunatic View Post
    was peewee over matched due to size ? certainly AB wasnt the biggest guy peewee fought
    Where does it say over matched due to size?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •